<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lingo, Vonage, AT&#038;T Fight for VOIP Market</title>
	<link>http://www.briefme.com/wordpress/archives/2005/03/05/lingo-vonage-att-fight-for-voip-market/</link>
	<description>News, Reviews, Editorials, Opinions and Rants</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Rubayat Ahsan</title>
		<link>http://www.briefme.com/wordpress/archives/2005/03/05/lingo-vonage-att-fight-for-voip-market/#comment-148</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.briefme.com/wordpress/archives/2005/03/05/lingo-vonage-att-fight-for-voip-market/#comment-148</guid>
					<description>I think a rate race will begin among the existing market leaders of conventional phone comapnies. Many other small entrepreneurs will grow at the same time. As a result of it end users will get the benefit of distant phone service at low cost. But make sure these existing leading companies should get the monopoly of new VOIP technology. Technocrat should dominate them rather than be dominated and keep the whole business available to all ends of the world. Do not encourage any kind of monopoly in terms of new technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think a rate race will begin among the existing market leaders of conventional phone comapnies. Many other small entrepreneurs will grow at the same time. As a result of it end users will get the benefit of distant phone service at low cost. But make sure these existing leading companies should get the monopoly of new VOIP technology. Technocrat should dominate them rather than be dominated and keep the whole business available to all ends of the world. Do not encourage any kind of monopoly in terms of new technology.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
